Legal Opinion
Carl H. Peterson Co. v. Zero Estates
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 16, 1977No. 47294PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PETERSON, Justice.
The First National Bank of Lakeville (hereafter “bank”) appeals from judgment in a mechanics lien foreclosure action in which the bank, as the mortgagee of property in Scott County, unsuccessfully claimed priority for its mortgage, although second in time to the mechanics liens on the same property, on grounds of equitable sub-rogation or, alternatively as to certain of the lienholders, on various grounds of notice and waiver.
The factual situation upon which the bank’s claims are asserted is not in dispute. It made a loan to Emil and Emma Braun in 1970 for $25,000, which was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Emmert v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- M. E. Kraft Excavating & Grading Co. v. Barac Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Heisler v. C. Aultman & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Elliott v. TainterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Sucker v. CranmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
3Cited by14 opinions
- Universal Title Insurance Company, a Minnesota Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Lamb Excavation, Inc. v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Citizens State Bank v. Raven Trading Partners, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Richards v. Security Pacific National BankCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
- Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. v. ChojnackiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.