Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Hoffman v. Tedcastle

The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

Decided May 15, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Application by William J. Hoffman for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel Charles B. Tedcastle, as a transfer agent of the Oregon Improvement Company, a foreign corporation, to exhibit to relator the transfer book and a list of the stockholders of said company.

1Opinion of the CourtMcADAM, J.

The defendant is the New York transfer agent of the Oregon Improvement Company, a foreign corporation created under the laws of Oregon, and doing business at Portland in that state. The relator, a stockholder of the company, requested the transfer agent to exhibit to him the transfer book and a list of the stockholders. Laws 1892, c. 688, § 53; Laws 1842, c. 165, §§ 1, 2; In re Sage, 70 N. Y. 220; In re Martin, 62 Hun, 557, 17 N. Y. Supp. 133; People v. Paton, 20 Abb. N. C. 172, 195; Ross v. Wigg, 34 Hun, 193. The defendant declined, upon the ground that the books had been sent to the home…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Port Chester Savings Bank v. CromwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. People Ex Rel. McMackin v. . Bd. of PoliceNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Sage v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. People Ex Rel. Nicholl v. New York Infant AsylumNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. People v. Rome, Watertown & Ogdensburg RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1886

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Desiderio v. ConnollyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  2. Dexter Sulphite Pulp & Paper Co. v. ShaverNew York Supreme Court · 1944
  3. In re CrosbyNew York Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API