Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Rainey v. Crowe

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1964No. 32015PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDDY, Presiding Judge.

This is a proceeding for mandamus instituted by relator in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis against respondents as members of and constituting the Board of *40Election Commissioners for the City of St. Louis. The purpose of relator’s mandamus •action is to compel respondents to publish and to print on the sample and official ballots the name of relator, a duly filed candidate for the office of Coroner of the City of St. Louis, as “Robert Rainey M.D.” Relator appeals from an adverse ruling in the trial court.

Relator, a duly licensed physician, claims he is…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hunt v. SearcySupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  2. State v. HandsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  3. State v. DeppeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  4. State Ex Rel. Hand v. BilyeuMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. Ohlmann v. Clarkson Saw Mill Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Matter of NataleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  3. People Ex Rel. Richter v. TelfordAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Toigo v. Columbia County Board of ElectionsNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Sooy v. GillNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API