Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Campbell

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 20, 1964PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Judge.

This action involves a postnuptial contract executed by a husband and wife under which she accepted certain property in lieu of her prospective distributable share of her husband’s estate. Upon her husband’s death testate, she renounced the provisions of his will and, claiming the contract was invalid, sought to take under the provisions of KRS 392.020. The trial court upheld the contract, ruled that her renunciation of his will was ineffective, and decided she could not take what would, otherwise amount to her statutory interest. The widow has appealed.

Z. W. Campbell died…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
  2. Redwine's v. RedwineCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. CarmodyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  4. Smith's Administrator v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  5. Robbins v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bishir v. BishirKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Luck v. LuckCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1986
  3. Hale v. Cundari Gas Transmission Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1970
  4. Linda Davis v. Karen DavisKentucky Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API