Legal Opinion

Appell v. Dickinson

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 23, 1954PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The appellant was the unsuccessful plaintiff in the circuit court. He filed a complaint against the appellee charging, in the first count, that the appellee, “maliciously intending to * * * bring him into public scandal and disgrace,” wrote a letter to Arthur W. Brooks that contained the following sentence: “ ‘This will repeat in writing the information which I delivered to you in person; i. e. that your salesman APPELL informed me that he had used fraud in the securing,of certain contracts and that this fraud was committed with your knowledge and consent.’ ” The appellant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Loeb v. GeronemusSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  2. Leonard, Et Vir v. WilsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
  3. Caldwell v. Personal Finance Co. of St. PetersburgSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  4. Nunan v. BullmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lewis v. EvansDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Rush-Hampton Industries, Inc. v. Home Ventilating InstituteDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1976
  3. Burris v. Morton F. Plant HospitalDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API