Legal Opinion
Caldwell v. Personal Finance Co. of St. Petersburg
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided June 6, 1950PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
46 So.2d 726 (1950)
CALDWELL
v.
PERSONAL FINANCE CO. OF ST. PETERSBURG.
Supreme Court of Florida, en Banc.
June 6, 1950.
Askew & Earle, St. Petersburg, for appellant.
Fisher & Sauls, St. Petersburg, for appellee.
HOBSON, Justice.
The question presented by this appeal is whether the amended declaration states a cause of action. The Circuit Judge held that the amended declaration did not state a cause of action, sustained demurrer thereto and entered final judgment in favor of the appellee (defendant below).
We cannot agree that the amended declaration fails to state a cause of action. Those portions of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Putnal v. InmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
- Bunch v. High Springs BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
3Cited by10 opinions
- Scott v. BuschDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Mays v. StrattonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Turner v. WainwrightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Clowney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
- Musto v. Bell South TelecommunicationsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.