Legal Opinion
Hastings v. Ford Motor Company
District Court, S.D. California
Decided October 19, 2020No. 3:19-cv-02217Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID HASTINGS, Case No. 19-cv-2217-BAS-MDD 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. (1) GRANTING IN PART AND 14 FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ 15 Defendants. RULE 12(b)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS THE MAGNUSON-MOSS 16 WARRANTY ACT CLAIMS; AND 17 (2) DENYING AS MOOT THE RULE 18 56 MOTION AS TO THE SONG- 19 BEVERLY WARRANTY ACT CLAIMS 20 21 (ECF No. 32) 22 23 24 25 Plaintiff David Hastings bought a vehicle from Defendant Ford Motor Company in 26 2013. Within a year, the vehicle started having various…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.