Legal Opinion

Reed v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1988No. 57517PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRATHER, Justice,

for the Court:

The decisive question in this appeal is whether a business transaction between a wholesale dealer of cars and the seller constituted an entrustment of the automobiles and a subsequent conversion or whether the transaction was a sale which would not give rise to an embezzlement charge. Holding that the transaction was a sale and that the charge of embezzlement was inappropriate, this Court vacates the conviction and discharges the defendant.

I

On January 24, 1986, Harold Reed was indicted in the Circuit Court of DeSoto County for embezzling or converting to his own…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harrison v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. United States v. KordelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Jim B. Edmonds v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re KnappMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  2. David W. Parvin v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016
  3. Fulks v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Fulks v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Tomarcus Monte Fulks v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API