Legal Opinion

Robinoe v. Doe, on the Demise of Colwell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1841PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from the Knox Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDewey, J.

This was an action of ejectment on the joint *demise of several persons for a lot of land in Vincennes. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The plaintiff proved that Ambrose Mallet, deceased, was in possession of the premises in dispute “upwards of twenty years before the commencement of this suit, and within twenty years, under a claim of title,'” and that the plaintiff’s lessors were his heirs at law. The consent rule admitted the possession of the defendant at the time of the institution of the action. Here the plaintiff rested- his cause. The defendant moved the Court to direct a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith ex dem. Teller v. LorillardNew York Supreme Court · 1813
  2. Coe v. GivanIndiana Supreme Court · 1825
  3. Doe v. WestIndiana Supreme Court · 1821

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Holten v. Board of Comm'rsIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Herff v. GriggsIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Reno v. RobertsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. WilsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. Van Auken v. MonroeMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API