Craig Arnold Thomas v. Jeffrey Macomber, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CRAIG ARNOLD THOMAS, No. 1:26-cv-01554-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT 13 v. JUDGE TO THIS ACTION 14 JEFFREY MACOMBER, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF 15 ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A Defendants. CLAIM 16 (ECF No. 1) 17 18 19 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 20 U.S.C. § 1983. 21 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s complaint, filed February 24, 2026. (ECF No. 1.) 22 I.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.