Legal Opinion

Carinha v. Action Crane Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 27, 1977Published

1Opinion of the Court

Motions for reargument or for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals each denied in all respects with $20 costs. Concur— Murphy, P. J., Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.; Lupiano and Markewich, JJ., dissent in the following memorandum by Lupiano, J. All parties to this litigation (with the exception of defendant Drott Co., the manufacturer of the crane, as to which defendant the complaint was dismissed on consent, and defendant T. J. Burke & Sons, Inc., the distributor of the crane, as to which defendant the action was discontinued prior to trial) seek in one fashion or another to obtain further…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Halloran v. Virginia Chemicals Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Charles v. . BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. In re the Estate of RothkoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  5. Umsted v. Scofield Engineering Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1928

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API