Hicks v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Judge ALLARD, writing for the Court
Nathaniel Hicks Jr. was convicted of four counts of first-degree unlawful contact for telephoning his girlfriend, N.A. Hicks made these phone calls from jail, where he was awaiting trial on a charge that he assaulted NA. .
On appeal, Hicks argues that Alaska courts have no power to prohibit a defendant in pretrial detention from contacting the alleged victim of- the crime. According to Hicks, courts have the authority to prohibit a defendant in pretrial detention from engaging in this contact only if the victim separately petitions the court to issue a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bitter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bauman v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Rust v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Surina v. BuckalewAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- James W. Wheeler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Department of Human Services v. A. W.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- United States v. Evans Santos DiazCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023