Legal Opinion

Hicks v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided June 24, 2016No. 2506 A-11826PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Judge ALLARD, writing for the Court

Nathaniel Hicks Jr. was convicted of four counts of first-degree unlawful contact for telephoning his girlfriend, N.A. Hicks made these phone calls from jail, where he was awaiting trial on a charge that he assaulted NA. .

On appeal, Hicks argues that Alaska courts have no power to prohibit a defendant in pretrial detention from contacting the alleged victim of- the crime. According to Hicks, courts have the authority to prohibit a defendant in pretrial detention from engaging in this contact only if the victim separately petitions the court to issue a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bitter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Bauman v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Rust v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Surina v. BuckalewAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. James W. Wheeler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Department of Human Services v. A. W.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. United States v. Evans Santos DiazCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API