Legal Opinion

Glens Falls Portland Cement Co. v. Delaware & Hudson Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 8, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

I deny the plaintiff’s motions in so far as they ask for judgment against the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company on the pleadings; in all other respects the motions are granted.

I. This action was brought to enforce a reparation order, dated August 14, 1939, of the Interstate Commerce Commission, hereinafter called the Commission, allowing a recovery to the petitioner in the sum of $12,-588.63, with interest, against the Delaware & Hudson Company, hereinafter called the D. & H., the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company, hereinafter called the New…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Meeker & Co. v. Lehigh Valley RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Louisville Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Glens Falls Portland Cement Co. v. Delaware &. Hudson Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API