Glens Falls Portland Cement Co. v. Delaware & Hudson Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLSEY, District Judge.
I deny the plaintiff’s motions in so far as they ask for judgment against the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company on the pleadings; in all other respects the motions are granted.
I. This action was brought to enforce a reparation order, dated August 14, 1939, of the Interstate Commerce Commission, hereinafter called the Commission, allowing a recovery to the petitioner in the sum of $12,-588.63, with interest, against the Delaware & Hudson Company, hereinafter called the D. & H., the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company, hereinafter called the New…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Meeker & Co. v. Lehigh Valley RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Louisville Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Glens Falls Portland Cement Co. v. Delaware &. Hudson Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933