Legal Opinion

Dye v. Davis

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1878PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Hancock Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, C. J.

This was a suit by the appellee, against the appellants, to obtain the partition of certain real estate.

In his complaint, the appellee alleged, in substance, that, *475on the 23d. day of September, 1873, one William II. Dye died intestate, and was, at and before his death, the owner, and seized in fee-simple, of certain lands and town lots, particularly described, in Hancock county, Indiana; that the said William II. Dye, at his death, left surviving him the appellant Lusetta Dye, as his widow, and William II. Dye, Jr., Mary Davis, then the wife of the appellee, Jane Dye and Erank Dye, as his…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Higham v. VanosdolIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Hinton v. WhittakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Spearman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API