Legal Opinion
United Pacific Insurance Company v. United States
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided October 12, 1970No. Civ. 69-591PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SOLOMON, Chief Judge:
United Pacific Insurance Company (UPIC), as surety, sued to recover the $13,107.69 which the Federal Highway Administration paid to the Internal Revenue Service.
In June, 1968, Koraek Co. (Korack) contracted with the government, through the Federal Highway Administration, to construct highways in Oregon. Korack, as principal, and UPIC, as surety, gave the government a performance bond on each contract as required by the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. §§ 270a(a), 270a(d). Korack assigned to UPIC all deferred payments, retainages, and money due Korack on the contracts in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Security Insurance Company of Hartford v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Standard Accident Ins. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
- United States ex rel. Peevy v. Pensacola Construction Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1966
3Cited by8 opinions
- Interfirst Bank Dallas, N.A. v. United States of America, and Internal Revenue Service, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- American Fidelity Fire Insurance v. Construcciones Werl, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1975
- Eric C. Nickerson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- Hamilton National Bank of Johnson City v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1972
- Hill v. McMartinDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.