Legal Opinion

Schnoor v. Deitchler

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 18, 1992No. 90-1637PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHULTZ, Justice.

This litigation was commenced by plaintiffs Bernard D. Schnoor and his wife Donna L. Schnoor to recover damages resulting from injuries Bernard received when his leg became entangled in a grain auger. Defendant Robert M. Deitchler owns the grain auger in question. Plaintiff Bernard alleges that defendant Ford New Holland, Inc. (Ford), is the successor corporation to Versatile Farm Equipment Operations (Versatile), manufacturer of the grain auger. The trial court submitted the issue of comparative fault of the parties to a jury. The jury determined damages and apportioned…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Briggs Transportation Co. v. Starr Sales Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  2. Konicek v. Loomis Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  3. Nichols v. Westfield Industries, Ltd.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  4. Inn Operations, Inc. v. River Hills Motor Inn Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  5. DeLapp v. Xtraman, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. HOK Sport, Inc. v. FC Des Moines, L.C.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  2. Morgan v. PerlowskiSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  3. Rowson v. Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1994
  4. Baumler v. HemesathSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  5. Coleman v. MonsonCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API