Legal Opinion

Williams v. Botts

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 21, 1999PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HERSCHEL P. FRANKS, J.

In this action, the issue is the width of plaintiffs right-of-way across a portion of defendants’ property. The Trial Court determined the width to be 25 feet and the plaintiff has appealed.

Plaintiff Ruth Williams and her husband Murray, now deceased, owned a tract of land in Loudon County. In 1975, the Williams swapped a tract of land with C.L. Williams, to gain access to Highway 321 (formerly Highway 95). The land acquired by C.L. Williams is now owned by the Creeks. It is uncontested that Ruth Williams possesses a sixty-foot wide easement running from the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McMillin v. Great Southern CorporationCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
  2. Osborne v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1971
  3. Town of McMinnville v. RheaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1958

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re BabyTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Lane v. SpriggsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  3. Silsbe v. Houston Levee Industrial Park, LLCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
  4. David Frounfelker v. Identity Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  5. Hitchock Metal Sources v. John D. MulfordCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API