Armbruster v. Gipp
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs and motion denied. Memorandum: We are unaware of any authority that would permit the granting of a permanent injunction during the pendency of an action by the simple expedient of obtaining an order to show cause for such injunction, which itself is the relief sought in the underlying action. At most, plaintiffs’ application was for a preliminary injunction which requires a showing that defendant is acting in violation of plaintiffs’ rights, which acts would render the ultimate judgment ineffectual and which, if continued, would produce…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- De Candido v. Young Stars, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sutton, DeLeeuw, Clark & Darcy v. BeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- L & J Roost, Ltd. v. Department of Consumer AffairsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Modern Telecommunications, Inc. v. ZimmermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- J.S. Anand Corp. v. Aviel Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Board of Managers v. RiosNew York Supreme Court · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.