Legal Opinion
Soverain Software LLC v. Victoria's Secret Direct Brand Management, LLC
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 12, 2015No. 2012-1649, 2012-1650PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DYK, Circuit Judge.
Victoria’s Secret Direct Brand Management, LLC (“Victoria’s Secret”) and Avon Products, Inc. (“Avon”) (collectively, “defendants”) appeal from a judgment of the District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The district court found that defendants infringed claims 34 and 51 of U.S. Patent No. 5,715,314 (the “'314 patent”) and claims 15, 17, and 39 of U.S. Patent No. 5,909,492 (the “'492 patent”) and that those claims were not invalid.
After the district court’s judgment, this court decided Soverain Software LLC v. Newegg Inc., 705 F.3d 1333 (Fed.Cir.2013), amended on…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. Swift-Eckrich, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. Bernice H. ShanbaumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Neely v. Martin K. Eby Construction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Jet, Inc. v. Sewage Aeration SystemsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- The Dow Chemical Company v. Nova Chemicals CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Maxlinear, Inc. v. Cf Crespe LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Papst Licensing Gmbh & Co. Kg v. Samsung Electronics AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Power Integrations, Inc. v. Semiconductor Components Indus., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Parkervision, Inc. v. Qualcomm IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.