Legal Opinion
Maxlinear, Inc. v. Cf Crespe LLC
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 25, 2018No. 2017-1039PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dyk, Circuit Judge.
Appellant MaxLinear, Inc. (“MaxLi-near”) appeals from the final written decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) in an inter partes review (“IPR”). The Board upheld the patentability of claims 1-4, 6-9,' and 16-21 of U.S. Patent No. 7,075,585 (“the ’585 patent”) owned by appellee CF CRESPE LLC (“CRESPE”). MaxLinear seeks review of the Board’s decision with respect to dependent claims 4, 6-9, and 20-21.
The Board- based its decision on an analysis of independent-claims" 1 and 17. However, in a separate IPR, No. IPR2014-00728 (“the ’728 IPR”), claims 1 and 17…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Ohio Willow Wood Co. v. Alps South, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Skf Usa Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Xy, LLC v. Trans Ova Genetics, L.C.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Regents of the Univ. of Minn. v. Lsi CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Sionyx, LLC v. Hamamatsu Photonics K.K.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Papst Licensing Gmbh & Co. Kg v. Samsung Electronics AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Power Integrations, Inc. v. Semiconductor Components Indus., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.