Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Hawkins

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 25, 2008No. 97,657Published

1DissentLeben, J.

Under K.S.A. 21-4720(b), a district judge has discretion to make the sentences either concurrent or consecutive in a multiple-conviction case. Concurrent sentences all share the same clock; the defendant serves only the longest sentence as less serious ones tick away alongside it. Consecutive sentences are a string of separate clocks; time doesn’t begin to count on a second sentence until the first one is fully served, which results in a lengthier time in custody.

Despite the importance of this issue, the district court is not required to give reasons for it- — and the district court’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. State v. HeathSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  3. State v. FloresSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  4. State v. SnowSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  5. State v. WoodburySupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API