State v. Hawkins
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1DissentLeben, J.
Under K.S.A. 21-4720(b), a district judge has discretion to make the sentences either concurrent or consecutive in a multiple-conviction case. Concurrent sentences all share the same clock; the defendant serves only the longest sentence as less serious ones tick away alongside it. Consecutive sentences are a string of separate clocks; time doesn’t begin to count on a second sentence until the first one is fully served, which results in a lengthier time in custody.
Despite the importance of this issue, the district court is not required to give reasons for it- — and the district court’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- State v. HeathSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- State v. FloresSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- State v. SnowSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- State v. WoodburySupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.