Legal Opinion

Consolino v. Thompson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 16, 1984No. 83—2181, 83—2384 consPublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jiganti

This action was commenced in order to recover for personal injuries allegedly sustained by the plaintiff, Lucille Consolino, when a metal object, which was apparently contained in a chocolate iced longjohn she had ingested, became imbedded in her throat. The plaintiff brought this suit, sounding in strict liability and negligence against defendants, C. E. Thompson, the bakery which manufactured and sold the longjohn, International Multifoods Co., the supplier of flour (International) and L. Karp & Sons, Inc., the supplier of chocolate syrup (L. Karp). In the count against L. Karp, the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Tweedy v. Wright Ford Sales, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Mort v. WalterIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Christie v. CallahanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  5. Tiffin v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Miller Ex Rel. Estate of Graziani v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  2. Wolfram Partnership, Ltd. v. LaSalle National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  3. McCullough v. Gallaher & SpeckAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. Stojkovich v. Monadnock BuildingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  5. Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. Otis Elevator Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API