Sherman v. Frank

Respondents sued appellant for damages resulting from a collision of their automobiles on a public highway. By the verdict they were awarded $2,500 each by the jury. After his motion for a new trial had been denied defendant brought the matter here. By his appeal appellant denies the sufficiency of the evidence, asserts excessive damages and assigns as errors the giving and refusal of requested instructions.

The Proof Is Sufficient.

Both parties were proceeding on U. S. Highway 66 about 17 miles west of Seligman, Arizona. Respondents were driving easterly in their Plymouth coupé; appellant was…