Legal Opinion
People v. Balov
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided May 23, 2018No. D073018PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBenke, Acting P. J.
*699After Peter Balov was arrested for suspected drunk driving, the arresting officer advised Balov "that per California law he was required to submit to a chemical test, either a breath or a blood test." Balov did not object and chose a blood test, which showed his blood alcohol level was above the legal limit. Balov was charged with misdemeanor driving under the influence ( Veh. Code, § 23152, subds. (a) & (b) ).1 Before trial, Balov moved to suppress the results of the blood test, arguing, inter alia, that his consent to the test was coerced. The court denied the motion, the appellate division…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. Gutierrez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Elmore v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- People v. GutierrezCalifornia Superior Court · 2019
- People v. GutierrezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- People v. GutierrezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.