Douglas County Board of Equalization v. Fidelity Castle Pines, Ltd.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lohr
We granted certiorari to review two decisions of the Colorado Court of Appeals that present a common issue as to the manner of valuing vacant land for property tax assessment purposes. The issue is whether section 39-1-103(14)(b), 16B C.R.S. (1991 Supp.), prior to its amendment in 1992, required assessing officers to consider indirect costs, such as developer’s profit and overhead, as part of the “cost of development” when using the market approach to appraisal. The 1992 amendment disallowed consideration of indirect costs, thereby raising the question of whether the 1992 amendment changed or…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Woodsmall v. Regional Transportation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Charnes v. LobatoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- State Engineer v. Castle Meadows, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- General Electric Co. v. NiemetSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Kern v. GebhardtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Corsentino v. CordovaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- City of Colorado Springs v. PowellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- Huddleston v. Grand County Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Frank M. Hall & Co. v. NewsomSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- People v. CovingtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.