Legal Opinion

Julio Pena, Nancy Pena v. Roxanne Cardona, in her official capacity; and Officer J Ortiz, in his official capacity

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided January 22, 2026No. 5:24-cv-00481Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION JULIO PENA, NANCY PENA, § Plaintiffs § § v. § Case No. SA-24-CA-00481-XR § ROXANNE CARDONA, IN HER § OFFICIAL CAPACITY; AND OFFICER J § ORTIZ, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY; § Defendants § ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT On this date, the Court considered Defendants Roxanne Cardona and Jonathan Ortiz’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 28) and the associated briefing (ECF Nos. 30, 35). After careful consideration, the Motion is GRANTED. BACKGROUND1 This case arises from a property dispute between, on one side,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API