Kiniry v. Kiniry

Opinion

DRANGINIS, J.

The defendant, Anthony J. Kiniry, filed a motion for reconsideration or reconsideration en banc of Kiniry v. Kiniry, 71 Conn. App. 614, 803 A.2d 352 (2002), which affirmed the judgment of the trial court in this marital dissolution action.1 We granted the defendant’s motion as to reconsideration and sua sponte ordered the parties to appear for oral argument.2 In his motion for reconsideration, the defendant claims that the record did not substantiate this court’s conclusion that the trial “court specifically noted . . . that the defendant had significant borrowing power .…