Legal Opinion

Ordlock v. Franchise Tax Board

California Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 2006No. S127649PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, C. J.

California personal income tax law references its federal counterpart as the basis upon which to calculate a taxpayer’s state taxable income and, ultimately, the state income tax owed for a specified tax period. California law does so by recognizing the amount reported as taxable income in the taxpayer’s federal income tax return and then applying adjustments to that amount as required by state law. Accordingly, in the majority of cases, a determination in an audit by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) that a California taxpayer’s federal personal income tax liability is…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In Re DannenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. DuBois v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Coca-Cola Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Harley-Davidson, Inc. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. EEL River Disposal & Resource Recovery Inc. v. County of HumboldtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. UFCW & Employers Benefit Trust v. Sutter Health CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Air China Ltd. v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. People v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API