Legal Opinion · Dissent

Columbus Railroad v. Joyce

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 27, 1920No. 11368Published

Action for damages; from Muscogee superior court — Judge Howard. February 3, 1920.

1DissentJenkins, P. J.

Upon proof of injury to a passenger of a railway or street-railway company by the running of its ears, the law raises a rebuttable presumption that the injury *654was brought about by negligence of the defendant company; but the presumption thus raised relates only to the particular acts of negligence charged by the petition; and if it should clearly appear that none of the acts set forth can properly be taken or accounted to be negligence, no presumption against the company will arise. The question in this case, as raised on demurrer, is whether the act of negligence charged by the petition, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pollak Bros. v. Niall-Herin Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  2. Ball v. MabrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  3. Augusta Railway & Electric Co. v. LyleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. ParishCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API