Beard v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
KRUEGER, Judge.
The offense is misapplication of public funds. The punishment assessed is confinement in the State penitentiary for a term of two years.
Appellant’s first complaint is that the trial court erred in declining to sustain his motion to quash the indictment based upon the following grounds:(a) Because the offense is not charged with sufficient certainty to enable the defendant to plead a conviction or acquit*129tal thereunder in bar of a subsequent prosecution for said offense.(b) Because it fails to charge with sufficient certainty the particular money he is charged with having…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Steiner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
- Weaver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Huffman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Qualls v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Tankersley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kirkpatrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Floyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Scanlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Hendrick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Floyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.