Floyd v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MORRISON, Presiding Judge.
The offense is a violation of Article 95, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., which denounces, among other things, the misapplication by a city officer, or person employed by such officer, of city property which has come into his possession by virtue of his office or em - ployment ; the punishment, 4 years.
Because of the unusual complexity of the State’s proof (the statement of facts consists of 500 pages) and in the interest of brevity, we have concluded that the issues presented for our determination may be made clear by outlining the evidence introduced by the State and the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Peterson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951
- McArthur v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1948
- Singleton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Jurek v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Nisbet v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Talamantez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.