Legal Opinion

State v. Canaday

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 17, 1984No. 1 CA-CR 6344PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACOBSON, Chief Judge.

The basic issue presented by this appeal is whether a statement given to a police officer by an accomplice in a custodial interrogation is admissible against a co-defendant, when the accomplice is deceased at the time of trial.

The defendant, John Gary Canaday, was charged by grand jury indictment with one count of conspiracy to commit a fraudulent scheme and one count of engaging in a fraudulent scheme. A jury found the de fendant guilty of conspiracy, but was deadlocked on the question of the verdict on the charge of fraudulent scheme. When the jury could not…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. United States v. Leslie Fleishman, United States of America v. Peter Combs, United States of America v. Stephen GreenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PopeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  2. State v. NavarroCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  3. State v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  4. State v. LatimerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API