Legal Opinion
Warren Ross Lumber Co. v. Haniel Clark & Son, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 14, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hubbs, P. J.:
The plaintiff is a resident of this State. The defendants are residents of Pennsylvania. The defendant Haniel Clark & Son, Inc., is a corporation organized under the laws of that State. It was indebted to the plaintiff upon its acceptance.
Prior to the commencement of this action certain creditors of Haniel Clark & Son, Inc., commenced an action in the State of Pennsylvania to conserve the property of said defendant. In said action the defendant Security Savings and Trust Company of Erie, Penn., was appointed receiver of said defendant corporation. The decree appointing the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Warner v. . JaffrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Martyne v. . American Union Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Willitts v. . WaiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Catlin v. Wilcox Silver-Plate Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Ward v. Connecticut Pipe Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Victrix Steamship Co. v. Salen Dry Cargo A.B.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Victrix Steamship Co. v. Salen Dry CargoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Union Guardian Trust Co. v. Broadway National Bank & Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1930
- Post Sign Service, Inc. v. Charles Eliot Perkins, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1931