Legal Opinion

People v. Raby

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 1996No. Docket 173809PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmolensk, J.

Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 1994-4, this special panel was convened to resolve the conflict between the prior opinion in this case, 213 Mich App 801 (1995), and People v Warner, 190 Mich App 26; 475 NW2d 397 (1991). The prior panel in this case held that it was bound by AO 1994-4 to follow People v Polus, 197 Mich App 197, 199; 495 NW2d 402 (1992), which held that evidence of prior instances of sexual penetration between a defendant and a victim do not constitute the “same criminal transaction” for the purpose of scoring Offense Variable (ov) 12 (criminal sexual penetration[s]). See…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. HawkinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. People v. TracyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Cavalier Manufacturing Co. v. Employers InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. People v. PolusMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. People v. Randolph WarnerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. RabyMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Stevens v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. People v. RabyMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. RabyMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  5. People v. RabyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API