Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Tamraz
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 19, 1994No. Docket Nos. B070292, B072405PublishedCited by 2 opinions
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
In consolidated actions for dissolution of marriage the trial court awarded judgment to wife based on a marital settlement agreement and ordered the judgment effective nunc pro tunc. In a subsequent order, the trial court awarded attorney fees to wife. We affirm.
Facts and Proceedings Below
We will refer to appellant, Joel Tamraz, as “husband” and respondent, Barbara Tamraz, as “wife.”
In September 1976, husband filed an action for dissolution of marriage. In October of that year husband and wife entered into a marital settlement agreement ‘to effect a complete and final…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Marriage of DoverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Hurst v. HurstCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Adoption of GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Guardianship of LyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- State v. Mercantile Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gray v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Guttman v. GuttmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021