Legal Opinion

Kiriluk v. Cohn

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 2, 1958No. Gen. 47,091PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE KILEY

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an action under the Dramshop Act (Ch. 43, § 135, et seq., Ill. Rev. Stat. 1949), by a widow, to recover damages for loss of support as a consequence of the intoxication and death of her husband, whom she shot and killed. The verdict and judgment were for plaintiff for $10,000. Defendants have appealed.

The defendants pose the issue here dramatically as follows: “As a matter of law it is improper to give the plaintiff a $10,000 reward for shooting her husband.” This over simplification begs the real question, whether the trial…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hunter v. TroupIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Shugart v. EganIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Avance v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  4. James v. WickerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
  5. Reget v. BellIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McCormick v. KopmannAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
  2. Schelin v. GoldbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Weiner v. TrasattiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  4. Parnham v. Carl W. Linder Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  5. Duda v. HabermanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API