Kiriluk v. Cohn
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE KILEY
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is an action under the Dramshop Act (Ch. 43, § 135, et seq., Ill. Rev. Stat. 1949), by a widow, to recover damages for loss of support as a consequence of the intoxication and death of her husband, whom she shot and killed. The verdict and judgment were for plaintiff for $10,000. Defendants have appealed.
The defendants pose the issue here dramatically as follows: “As a matter of law it is improper to give the plaintiff a $10,000 reward for shooting her husband.” This over simplification begs the real question, whether the trial…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hunter v. TroupIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
- Shugart v. EganIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
- Avance v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
- James v. WickerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
- Reget v. BellIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McCormick v. KopmannAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
- Schelin v. GoldbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Weiner v. TrasattiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
- Parnham v. Carl W. Linder Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1962
- Duda v. HabermanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.