Legal Opinion

Oster v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Engineers

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County

Decided April 8, 1922No. 2; Equity Docket No. 6Published

1Opinion of the Court

Hassler, J.,

On March 4, 1922, we sustained a demurrer to and dismissed plaintiff’s bill. The reason we sustained it was because it is not alleged in the bill that the plaintiff gave the defendant company notice of her claim, as she was required to do in the certificate which was made part of her bill, but alleged that the defendant had waived the .requirements of such notice or proof because it had paid the amount called for in the eertifi-*179cate to another person. The certificate referred to certifies that Anthony Oster was a member of the defendant association, and that upon his death, after…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kelsey v. MurphySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
  2. Rider v. York Haven Water & Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  3. Darlington v. ClemsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  4. Conrad v. O'BoyleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API