People v. Stroller
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The police were obligated to respond to the call and investigate the complaint of a man armed with a gun. *1053At night in a high crime area they found the defendant who matched the description given by the caller. When, upon inquiry by the police, the defendant gave an unintelligible, unresponsive reply, the officer could then make a limited pat down search in the nature of a frisk, not to discover evidence of a crime, but in order to pursue his investigation without fear of violence (see, People v Stewart, 41 NY2d 65).
Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division should be…
2Cited by22 opinions
- People v. BenjaminNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. LandyNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. SamuelsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- People v. ReynoldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. BronstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.