Legal Opinion

Pub. Emp. Ret. Admin. Comm'n v. Contributory Ret. Appeal Bd.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 13, 2018No. SJC–12331PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCypher, J.

*746**832The plaintiff, the Public Employee Retirement Administration Commission (PERAC), appeals from a Superior Court judge's decision affirming a determination by the Contributory Retirement Appeal Board (CRAB) that sick or vacation payments, when used to supplement workers' compensation payments, are not "regular compensation" as defined in G. L. c. 32, § 1. PERAC argues that CRAB's decision is incorrect as a matter of law. We disagree, and for the following reasons we affirm the decision of the Superior Court judge.

Background. The relevant facts are not in dispute. From September 30, 1985,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Condon v. HaitsmaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  2. Hallett v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  3. Bulger v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  4. BOSTON ASS'N OF SCH. ADM'RS & SUP. v. Boston Ret. Bd.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  5. Hayes v. Retirement Board of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. STEPHEN O'MALLEY & Another v. CONTRIBUTORY RETIREMENT APPEAL BOARD & AnotherMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API