Legal Opinion

Ammons v. Layton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 13, 1955PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The essential rules governing appeals from lower court rulings on motions to strike are collected and assembled in Daniel v. Gardner, 240 N.C. 249, 81 S.E. 2d 660. Under application of the prin- . ciples there stated, we conclude it has not been made to appear that the defendant will be prejudiced by the allegations challenged on this appeal. See Ledford v. Transportation Co., 237 N.C. 317, 74 S.E. 2d 653; Hinson v. Britt, 232 N.C. 379, 61 S.E. 2d 185. See also Wright v. Credit Co., 212 N.C. 87, 192 S.E. 844 ; 33 Am. Jur., Libel and Slander, sections 236 and 241.

It is noted that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Daniel v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. ColeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Hinson v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Ledford v. Marion Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Wright v. Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cudworth v. Reserve Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API