Legal Opinion

Darragh v. SUPERIOR CT. IN & FOR CTY. OF MARICOPA

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 25, 1995No. 1 CA-SA 95-0005PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEISBERG, Judge.

Petitioner Charles L. Darragh seeks special action relief from the trial court’s denial of his motion for summary judgment in which he asserted that he is entitled to judicial witness immunity from the claims of Real Parties in Interest, Bonnie, Alice, and Mike Michael (the “Michaels”). To resolve this question, we must decide whether the City of Phoenix (“City”) was “seriously contemplating litigation” when Petitioner prepared two appraisals for use by the City in acquiring the Michaels’ land.

SPECIAL ACTION JURISDICTION

A special action challenging the denial of summary…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Green Acres Trust v. LondonArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Bruce v. Byrne-Stevens & Associates Engineers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Middlesex Concrete Products & Excavating Corp. v. Carteret Industrial Ass'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  4. Western Technologies, Inc. v. Sverdrup & Parcel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  5. Walker v. MajorsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Provencher v. Buzzell-Plourde AssociatesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  2. Linder v. Brown & HerrickCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  3. William M. Giffin v. Jack Summerlin, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  4. Tucson Airport Authority v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd'sCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  5. Goddard v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API