Legal Opinion

Goddard v. Fields

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 16, 2007No. 1 CA-SA 06-0114PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OROZCO, Judge.

¶ 1 Terry Goddard, Monica Goddard and the Office of the Arizona Attorney General (collectively, the Attorney General) petitioned this court for special-action relief, challenging the trial court’s order finding that the Attorney General is not entitled to absolute immunity, but only qualified immunity for the allegedly defamatory statements he published in a press release regarding a lawsuit his office is pursuing. For the following reasons, we accept jurisdiction, but deny relief.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 This special action arises from a lawsuit the Attorney…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Nixon v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Matson v. MargiottiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Green Acres Trust v. LondonArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. People Ex Rel. Hartigan v. Knecht Services, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Edwards v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
  2. Javan Mesnard Et Ux v. Hon. campagnolo/shooterArizona Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Pinal County v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  4. Javan Mesnard Et Ux v. Hon. campagnolo/shooterArizona Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API