Legal Opinion

Ditto v. Martin

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 13, 1990No. 12A04-8910-CV-446PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Judge.

Appellant Max L. Ditto, executor of the estate of Mary Runyan, appeals his removal—without hearing or notice of charges— as executor of Mary Runyan’s estate by the Clinton Circuit Court. The issue here is:

Whether Ditto’s removal as executor without either notice of charges against him or a hearing was contrary to law because no emergency, as required by Ind.Code 29-1-10-6, existed.

We reverse.

FACTS

The facts most favorable to the judgment are as follows:

Mary Runyan died on December 27, 1986, leaving an estate of just under $1,000,000. On December 29, 1986, Max Ditto (Ditto),…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Schumacher v. Adams Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Diaz v. DuncanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. State, Ex Rel. Cassel v. JohnstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Meyer v. Anderson Banking Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1961
  5. May v. SansberryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Elizabeth J. Hollrah and Janice Stacy, Individually and as Beneficiaries and Former Personal Representatives of the Estate of Laura E. Barker v. Estate of Laura E. Barker (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API