Legal Opinion

Costanzo v. Chianese

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 14, 1955No. Appeal, No. 87PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gunther, J.,

This appeal is from the order of the lower court dismissing defendants’ motions for a new trial and judgment n.o.v. Plaintiff filed suit in assumpsit based on *415an oral contract dated July 10, 1949, for labor and material furnished in construction of defendants’ residence. Prior to the suit in assumpsit, plaintiff filed pleadings for mechanic’s lien and issued a writ of scire facias. The mechanic’s lien, however, due to formal defects, was stricken off. The case was tried on February 18,1953. The testimony of the plaintiff revealed that he stopped work after ten days when…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kampman v. Pittsburgh Contracting & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Corcoran v. HueySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Turner Hydraulics, Inc. v. Susquehanna Construction Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. State v. LinarteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  3. Rees, Weaver & Co. v. M.B.C. Paper Mill Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Donatucci v. UtterbackSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Stratford v. BolandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API