Legal Opinion

People v. Arnold

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 5, 1996No. 96SA211PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

The respondent and the assistant disciplinary counsel have entered into a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct. C.R.C.P. 241.18. The parties agreed in the conditional admission to the imposition of discipline in the range of a public censure to suspension from the practice of law for thirty days. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admission, with the recommendation that the respondent be suspended for thirty days. We accept the conditional admission and the inquiry panel’s recommendation.

I

The respondent was admitted to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. MarmonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. People v. BlanckSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. People v. BelinaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Statewide Grievance Committee v. BurtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API