Legal Opinion
Perales-Cumpean v. Ashcroft
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 25, 2005No. 03-9553PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Graciela Perales-Cumpean is a citizen of Mexico who faces removal from this country. She seeks review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that she is not eligible for cancellation of removal under the battered spouse provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(2). Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss the petition for review, contending that this court lacks jurisdiction to review the discretionary decisions that are the subject of petitioner’s petition for review. We dismiss the petition for review in part…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Calcano-Martinez v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Glory Obianuju Ezeagwuna v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Laura Luis Hernandez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Jocelyn Agonoy Nakamoto v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Franklin Savings Corp. v. United States (In Re Franklin Savings Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Husyev v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Pankajkumar Patel v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- Alzainati v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Jaime Mireles v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.