Legal Opinion

Paul C. Tate, Jr. v. John Ed Bradley and the Washington Post Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 10, 1988No. 87-4175PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Tate filed suit to rectify what he viewed as defamation by Appellees John Ed Bradley and The Washington Post in their depiction of him as a Mardi Gras merrymaker. The newspaper article, carried as a human-interest feature, was titled “Cajun Mardi Gras — The Native Returns for Raucous Rights” and recounted the events of Mardi Gras 1984 in the heart of Acadian Louisiana, from the perspective of a recently-departed native son. Tate objected to the following excerpt:

The gravel road cuts through a dried-out soybean field and a crawfish farm. The courir stops…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Madison v. BoltonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  4. Carter v. Catfish CabinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Howard L. Makofsky, Jr. v. Raymond C. Cunningham, IICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Frazier v. CelebrezzeDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1965
  2. Russo v. Conde Nast PublicationsDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1992
  3. Immanuel v. CooperDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API