Legal Opinion

Buie v. Buie

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 15, 1932No. 8685PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

The main question to be decided is whether a writ of prohibition will lie in a case like the present. The general rule is that prohibition will not lie 'if any other adequate remedy is available. The Civil Code (1910), § 5458, provides: “The writ of prohibition may be granted in vacation. It is the counterpart of mandamus, to arrest illegal proceedings by any court officer where no other legal *31remedy or relief is given; and the granting or refusal thereof is governed by the same principles of right, necessity, and justice. The return must be in term, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Macon v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  2. Jackson v. CalhounSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  3. Winkles v. Simpson Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  4. Hudson v. PrestonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  5. Heaton v. HooperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sexual Offender Registration Review Board v. BerzettSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  2. Owens v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  3. McDonald v. WimpySupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  4. Mundy v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  5. Wright v. WoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API