Dae Sung Hi Tech Co., LTD v. D&B Sales, Inc.
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * * 4 Dae Sung Hi Tech Co., LTD, et al., Case No. 2:22-cv-00030-ART-BNW 5 Plaintiffs, 6 Order v. 7 D&B Sales, Inc., et al., 8 Defendants. 9 10 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Defendants’ Discovery Responses and 11 for Sanctions. ECF No. 33. Defendants opposed at ECF No. 37, and Plaintiffs replied at ECF No. 12 38. 13 The parties are familiar with the arguments. As a result, the Court only incorporates them 14 as relevant to its Order. 15 I. Applicable Law 16 A propounding party may move for an order compelling an answer…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling ConsultantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- In re Capital One Bank Credit Card Interest Rate LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2012