Alameda Cnty. Soc. Servs. Agency v. T.H. (In re M.H.)
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtPollak, J.
*1299The Alameda County Social Services Agency (the agency) and E.W. appeal an order denying their request that one-year-old M.H. be moved from his current non-relative foster home to the Minnesota home of his maternal great-aunt (E.W.). They contend the court erred by disregarding the statutory preference for relative placement ( Welf. & Inst. Code,1 *153§ 361.3 ) and by relying instead on the statutory preference for caretaker placement (§ 366.26, subd. (k) ). We conclude that neither statutory preference was applicable in this instance and that faced with the difficult decision between two…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re Stephanie M.California Supreme Court · 1994
3Cited by9 opinions
- San Diego Cnty. Health & Human Servs. Agency v. Y.M. (In re Maria Q.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- In re A.A. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- In re C.C. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
- In re D.D. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
- In re K.L. CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.